State senator for the 25th District, a Republican. In the Senate since the 2018–2019 session, and before that in the General Assembly, for the 25th District, from the 2010–2011 session to the 2018–2019 session.
A bill counts for the member who was its chief sponsor last. Shells, bills filed to be amended into something else later, count only once they pass a chamber. How these are measured
The 2026–2027 session so far
On November 6, 2026, day 297 of its term, beside eight earlier sessions on the same day of theirs.
Bills as chief sponsor: 232; on the same day of earlier terms, from 27 (2010–2011) to 319 (2018–2019).
Bills as chief sponsor232
not counting shells until they pass a chamber
27 2010–2011319 2018–2019
Passed their chamber: 1%; on the same day of earlier terms, from 0% (2010–2011) to 4% (2020–2021).
Passed their chamber1%
3 of 232, so far
0% 2010–20114% 2020–2021
Became law: 0%; on the same day of earlier terms, from 0% (2010–2011) to 3% (2020–2021).
Became law0%
0 of 232, so far
0% 2010–20113% 2020–2021
Carried from the other chamber: 0; on the same day of earlier terms, from 0 (2012–2013) to 3 (2016–2017).
Carried from the other chamber0
0 became law
0 2012–20133 2016–2017
Bills co-sponsored: 214; on the same day of earlier terms, from 39 (2010–2011) to 140 (2018–2019).
31 not past the General Assembly · 1 carried from the Senate · 65 co-sponsored
Against what was expected
Each term's bills, scored the way the Center for Effective Lawmaking scores every state legislator, beside what a member in the same place would be expected to score. A term still sitting is scored as it stands.
On each scale, a dot is another member of the chamber that term, the shaded band is about as expected, and the triangle marks the middle member.
2026–2027 · Senate: 1.9 times what was expected, more than expected, for a senator in the minority, not chairing a committee, in a fifth term; the middle senator scored 0.9 times; 40 senators that term.
2026–2027 · Senateso far, as of November 6, 20261.9×
lessmore
More than expected, for a senator in the minority, not chairing a committee, in a fifth term. The middle senator: 0.9×.
Terms counted from 2000.
2024–2025 · Senate: 2.9 times what was expected, more than expected, for a senator in the minority, not chairing a committee, in a fourth term; the middle senator scored 0.9 times; 41 senators that term.
2024–2025 · Senate2.9×
lessmore
More than expected, for a senator in the minority, not chairing a committee, in a fourth term. The middle senator: 0.9×.
Terms counted from 2000.
2022–2023 · Senate: 1.9 times what was expected, more than expected, for a senator in the minority, not chairing a committee, in a third term; the middle senator scored 1.0 times; 42 senators that term.
2022–2023 · Senate1.9×
lessmore
More than expected, for a senator in the minority, not chairing a committee, in a third term. The middle senator: 1.0×.
Terms counted from 2000.
2020–2021 · Senate: 2.0 times what was expected, more than expected, for a senator in the minority, not chairing a committee, in a second term; the middle senator scored 0.8 times; 42 senators that term.
2020–2021 · Senate2.0×
lessmore
More than expected, for a senator in the minority, not chairing a committee, in a second term. The middle senator: 0.8×.
Terms counted from 2000.
2018–2019 · Senate: 2.4 times what was expected, more than expected, for a senator in the minority, not chairing a committee, in a first term; the middle senator scored 0.8 times; 44 senators that term.
2018–2019 · Senate2.4×
lessmore
More than expected, for a senator in the minority, not chairing a committee, in a first term. The middle senator: 0.8×.
Terms counted from 2000.
2018–2019 · General Assembly: 2.0 times what was expected, more than expected, for an assembly member in the minority, not chairing a committee, in a fifth term; the middle assembly member scored 0.9 times; 90 assembly members that term.
2018–2019 · General Assembly2.0×
lessmore
More than expected, for an assembly member in the minority, not chairing a committee, in a fifth term. The middle assembly member: 0.9×.
Terms counted from 2000.
2016–2017 · General Assembly: 1.9 times what was expected, more than expected, for an assembly member in the minority, not chairing a committee, in a fourth term; the middle assembly member scored 0.8 times; 84 assembly members that term.
2016–2017 · General Assembly1.9×
lessmore
More than expected, for an assembly member in the minority, not chairing a committee, in a fourth term. The middle assembly member: 0.8×.
Terms counted from 2000.
2014–2015 · General Assembly: 1.2 times what was expected, about as expected, for an assembly member in the minority, not chairing a committee, in a third term; the middle assembly member scored 0.7 times; 86 assembly members that term.
2014–2015 · General Assembly1.2×
lessmore
About as expected, for an assembly member in the minority, not chairing a committee, in a third term. The middle assembly member: 0.7×.
Terms counted from 2000.
2012–2013 · General Assembly: 2.0 times what was expected, more than expected, for an assembly member in the minority, not chairing a committee, in a second term; the middle assembly member scored 0.8 times; 77 assembly members that term.
2012–2013 · General Assembly2.0×
lessmore
More than expected, for an assembly member in the minority, not chairing a committee, in a second term. The middle assembly member: 0.8×.
Terms counted from 2000.
2010–2011 · General Assembly: 1.1 times what was expected, about as expected, for an assembly member in the minority, not chairing a committee, in a first term; the middle assembly member scored 1.1 times; 88 assembly members that term.
2010–2011 · General Assembly1.1×
lessmore
About as expected, for an assembly member in the minority, not chairing a committee, in a first term. The middle assembly member: 1.1×.
Terms counted from 2000.
Across the aisle
Co-sponsorships, given and drawn, with the other party, set among the members of the same party in the chamber that term.
On each scale, a dot is another member of that party, and the triangle marks the middle one.
2026–2027 · Senate: 44% of co-sponsorships crossed party lines; the middle Republican senator, 44%.
2026–2027 · Senateso far, as of November 6, 202644%
0%40%
204 of 461 co-sponsorships with other senators crossed party lines. The middle Republican senator: 44%.
2024–2025 · Senate: 46% of co-sponsorships crossed party lines; the middle Republican senator, 46%.
2024–2025 · Senate46%
0%40%
206 of 444 co-sponsorships with other senators crossed party lines. The middle Republican senator: 46%.
2022–2023 · Senate: 47% of co-sponsorships crossed party lines; the middle Republican senator, 45%.
2022–2023 · Senate47%
0%40%
140 of 299 co-sponsorships with other senators crossed party lines. The middle Republican senator: 45%.
2020–2021 · Senate: 52% of co-sponsorships crossed party lines; the middle Republican senator, 52%.
2020–2021 · Senate52%
0%40%
186 of 357 co-sponsorships with other senators crossed party lines. The middle Republican senator: 52%.
2018–2019 · Senate: 16% of co-sponsorships crossed party lines; the middle Republican senator, 56%.
2018–2019 · Senate16%
0%40%
50 of 319 co-sponsorships with other senators crossed party lines. The middle Republican senator: 56%.
2018–2019 · General Assembly: 26% of co-sponsorships crossed party lines; the middle Republican assembly member, 40%.
2018–2019 · General Assembly26%
0%40%
122 of 478 co-sponsorships with other assembly members crossed party lines. The middle Republican assembly member: 40%.
2016–2017 · General Assembly: 29% of co-sponsorships crossed party lines; the middle Republican assembly member, 41%.
2016–2017 · General Assembly29%
0%40%
123 of 424 co-sponsorships with other assembly members crossed party lines. The middle Republican assembly member: 41%.
2014–2015 · General Assembly: 33% of co-sponsorships crossed party lines; the middle Republican assembly member, 39%.
2014–2015 · General Assembly33%
0%40%
98 of 294 co-sponsorships with other assembly members crossed party lines. The middle Republican assembly member: 39%.
2012–2013 · General Assembly: 32% of co-sponsorships crossed party lines; the middle Republican assembly member, 37%.
2012–2013 · General Assembly32%
0%40%
63 of 195 co-sponsorships with other assembly members crossed party lines. The middle Republican assembly member: 37%.
2010–2011 · General Assembly: 38% of co-sponsorships crossed party lines; the middle Republican assembly member, 37%.
2010–2011 · General Assembly38%
0%40%
36 of 96 co-sponsorships with other assembly members crossed party lines. The middle Republican assembly member: 37%.
How these are measured
A bill counts for the member who was its chief sponsor last. A shell, a bill introduced to "make a technical change" so that it can be amended into something else later, counts once it has passed a chamber; until then it counts for no one.
Each term's score counts a member's bills at five steps: filed, acted on in committee, out of committee, passed their chamber, and became law. At each step a member's bills are taken as a share of all the chamber's, and the shares are added up, so that the chamber's average member scores 1. This follows the Center for Effective Lawmaking's method in outline. It differs in two ways: it counts every bill alike, where the Center weighs some as more significant than others, and it does not count shells that never moved, which the Center counts as bills.
What was expected of a member is worked out from the members of the same chamber and term: whether they were in the majority, whether they chaired a committee, and how many terms they had served in that chamber, counted from 2000, where l9n's records begin. About as expected is between half and one and a half times that. A term still sitting is scored as it stands that day, and will move.
Across the aisle counts the co-sponsorships between a member and the others in their chamber, those they gave and those their bills drew, and how many were with the other party. Each member is set among their own party, because the minority party crosses more.