Assembly member for the 14th District, a Democrat. In the General Assembly since the 2008–2009 session.
A bill counts for the member who was its chief sponsor last. Shells, bills filed to be amended into something else later, count only once they pass a chamber. How these are measured
The 2026–2027 session so far
On November 6, 2026, day 297 of its term, beside nine earlier sessions on the same day of theirs.
Bills as chief sponsor: 61; on the same day of earlier terms, from 6 (2008–2009) to 148 (2018–2019).
Bills as chief sponsor61
not counting shells until they pass a chamber
6 2008–2009148 2018–2019
Passed their chamber: 8%; on the same day of earlier terms, from 1% (2012–2013) to 17% (2008–2009).
Passed their chamber8%
5 of 61, so far
1% 2012–201317% 2008–2009
Became law: 3%; on the same day of earlier terms, from 0% (2008–2009) to 2% (2016–2017).
Became law3%
2 of 61, so far
0% 2008–20092% 2016–2017
Carried from the other chamber: 0; on the same day of earlier terms, from 0 (2008–2009) to 8 (2018–2019).
Carried from the other chamber0
0 became law
0 2008–20098 2018–2019
Bills co-sponsored: 79; on the same day of earlier terms, from 50 (2008–2009) to 240 (2018–2019).
4 became law · 3 passed the General Assembly · 22 not past the General Assembly · 1 carried from the Senate · 127 co-sponsored
Against what was expected
Each term's bills, scored the way the Center for Effective Lawmaking scores every state legislator, beside what a member in the same place would be expected to score. A term still sitting is scored as it stands.
On each scale, a dot is another member of the chamber that term, the shaded band is about as expected, and the triangle marks the middle member.
2026–2027 · General Assembly: 0.8 times what was expected, about as expected, for an assembly member in the majority, chairing a committee, in a tenth term; the middle assembly member scored 0.8 times; 80 assembly members that term.
2026–2027 · General Assemblyso far, as of November 6, 20260.8×
lessmore
About as expected, for an assembly member in the majority, chairing a committee, in a tenth term. The middle assembly member: 0.8×.
Terms counted from 2000.
2024–2025 · General Assembly: 0.9 times what was expected, about as expected, for an assembly member in the majority, chairing a committee, in a ninth term; the middle assembly member scored 0.9 times; 83 assembly members that term.
2024–2025 · General Assembly0.9×
lessmore
About as expected, for an assembly member in the majority, chairing a committee, in a ninth term. The middle assembly member: 0.9×.
Terms counted from 2000.
2022–2023 · General Assembly: 1.1 times what was expected, about as expected, for an assembly member in the majority, chairing a committee, in a eighth term; the middle assembly member scored 1.0 times; 83 assembly members that term.
2022–2023 · General Assembly1.1×
lessmore
About as expected, for an assembly member in the majority, chairing a committee, in a eighth term. The middle assembly member: 1.0×.
Terms counted from 2000.
2020–2021 · General Assembly: 1.1 times what was expected, about as expected, for an assembly member in the majority, chairing a committee, in a seventh term; the middle assembly member scored 0.9 times; 75 assembly members that term.
2020–2021 · General Assembly1.1×
lessmore
About as expected, for an assembly member in the majority, chairing a committee, in a seventh term. The middle assembly member: 0.9×.
Terms counted from 2000.
2018–2019 · General Assembly: 1.7 times what was expected, more than expected, for an assembly member in the majority, chairing a committee, in a sixth term; the middle assembly member scored 0.9 times; 90 assembly members that term.
2018–2019 · General Assembly1.7×
lessmore
More than expected, for an assembly member in the majority, chairing a committee, in a sixth term. The middle assembly member: 0.9×.
Terms counted from 2000.
2016–2017 · General Assembly: 1.7 times what was expected, more than expected, for an assembly member in the majority, chairing a committee, in a fifth term; the middle assembly member scored 0.8 times; 84 assembly members that term.
2016–2017 · General Assembly1.7×
lessmore
More than expected, for an assembly member in the majority, chairing a committee, in a fifth term. The middle assembly member: 0.8×.
Terms counted from 2000.
2014–2015 · General Assembly: 2.1 times what was expected, more than expected, for an assembly member in the majority, chairing a committee, in a fourth term; the middle assembly member scored 0.7 times; 86 assembly members that term.
2014–2015 · General Assembly2.1×
lessmore
More than expected, for an assembly member in the majority, chairing a committee, in a fourth term. The middle assembly member: 0.7×.
Terms counted from 2000.
2012–2013 · General Assembly: 1.2 times what was expected, about as expected, for an assembly member in the majority, not chairing a committee, in a third term; the middle assembly member scored 0.8 times; 77 assembly members that term.
2012–2013 · General Assembly1.2×
lessmore
About as expected, for an assembly member in the majority, not chairing a committee, in a third term. The middle assembly member: 0.8×.
Terms counted from 2000.
2010–2011 · General Assembly: 1.7 times what was expected, more than expected, for an assembly member in the majority, not chairing a committee, in a second term; the middle assembly member scored 1.1 times; 88 assembly members that term.
2010–2011 · General Assembly1.7×
lessmore
More than expected, for an assembly member in the majority, not chairing a committee, in a second term. The middle assembly member: 1.1×.
Terms counted from 2000.
2008–2009 · General Assembly: 1.2 times what was expected, about as expected, for an assembly member in the majority, not chairing a committee, in a first term; the middle assembly member scored 0.9 times; 86 assembly members that term.
2008–2009 · General Assembly1.2×
lessmore
About as expected, for an assembly member in the majority, not chairing a committee, in a first term. The middle assembly member: 0.9×.
Terms counted from 2000.
Across the aisle
Co-sponsorships, given and drawn, with the other party, set among the members of the same party in the chamber that term.
On each scale, a dot is another member of that party, and the triangle marks the middle one.
2026–2027 · General Assembly: 15% of co-sponsorships crossed party lines; the middle Democratic assembly member, 8%.
2026–2027 · General Assemblyso far, as of November 6, 202615%
0%40%
29 of 200 co-sponsorships with other assembly members crossed party lines. The middle Democratic assembly member: 8%.
2024–2025 · General Assembly: 16% of co-sponsorships crossed party lines; the middle Democratic assembly member, 8%.
2024–2025 · General Assembly16%
0%40%
42 of 256 co-sponsorships with other assembly members crossed party lines. The middle Democratic assembly member: 8%.
2022–2023 · General Assembly: 25% of co-sponsorships crossed party lines; the middle Democratic assembly member, 10%.
2022–2023 · General Assembly25%
0%40%
77 of 313 co-sponsorships with other assembly members crossed party lines. The middle Democratic assembly member: 10%.
2020–2021 · General Assembly: 19% of co-sponsorships crossed party lines; the middle Democratic assembly member, 9%.
2020–2021 · General Assembly19%
0%40%
91 of 477 co-sponsorships with other assembly members crossed party lines. The middle Democratic assembly member: 9%.
2018–2019 · General Assembly: 19% of co-sponsorships crossed party lines; the middle Democratic assembly member, 9%.
2018–2019 · General Assembly19%
0%40%
126 of 680 co-sponsorships with other assembly members crossed party lines. The middle Democratic assembly member: 9%.
2016–2017 · General Assembly: 16% of co-sponsorships crossed party lines; the middle Democratic assembly member, 13%.
2016–2017 · General Assembly16%
0%40%
105 of 652 co-sponsorships with other assembly members crossed party lines. The middle Democratic assembly member: 13%.
2014–2015 · General Assembly: 19% of co-sponsorships crossed party lines; the middle Democratic assembly member, 12%.
2014–2015 · General Assembly19%
0%40%
115 of 595 co-sponsorships with other assembly members crossed party lines. The middle Democratic assembly member: 12%.
2012–2013 · General Assembly: 14% of co-sponsorships crossed party lines; the middle Democratic assembly member, 14%.
2012–2013 · General Assembly14%
0%40%
58 of 421 co-sponsorships with other assembly members crossed party lines. The middle Democratic assembly member: 14%.
2010–2011 · General Assembly: 12% of co-sponsorships crossed party lines; the middle Democratic assembly member, 13%.
2010–2011 · General Assembly12%
0%40%
45 of 385 co-sponsorships with other assembly members crossed party lines. The middle Democratic assembly member: 13%.
2008–2009 · General Assembly: 3% of co-sponsorships crossed party lines; the middle Democratic assembly member, 12%.
2008–2009 · General Assembly3%
0%40%
7 of 201 co-sponsorships with other assembly members crossed party lines. The middle Democratic assembly member: 12%.
How these are measured
A bill counts for the member who was its chief sponsor last. A shell, a bill introduced to "make a technical change" so that it can be amended into something else later, counts once it has passed a chamber; until then it counts for no one.
Each term's score counts a member's bills at five steps: filed, acted on in committee, out of committee, passed their chamber, and became law. At each step a member's bills are taken as a share of all the chamber's, and the shares are added up, so that the chamber's average member scores 1. This follows the Center for Effective Lawmaking's method in outline. It differs in two ways: it counts every bill alike, where the Center weighs some as more significant than others, and it does not count shells that never moved, which the Center counts as bills.
What was expected of a member is worked out from the members of the same chamber and term: whether they were in the majority, whether they chaired a committee, and how many terms they had served in that chamber, counted from 2000, where l9n's records begin. About as expected is between half and one and a half times that. A term still sitting is scored as it stands that day, and will move.
Across the aisle counts the co-sponsorships between a member and the others in their chamber, those they gave and those their bills drew, and how many were with the other party. Each member is set among their own party, because the minority party crosses more.